There are billions more dollars spent on IT services than print services, yet IT providers are not screaming about Lease Terms or Buyouts!
Does the industry selling business print equipment and services have an obsession with saving people money? If so, does that, in fact, describe a commodity business model?
What is amazing is that print equipment, supplies, and services represent less than 2% of nearly all organizations' comprehensive technology spend. And yet many in the print services industry are still selling based on price or reducing a prospect's equipment leasing and services expense. Or, the obsession with saving them from a competitor's outrageous services!
We hear things like 10% increases. OMG, or auto escalations! What a terrible thing. I think that all the print equipment dealers who have escalations are now grateful they have contracts that are based on the reality of price hikes and much better off than those obsessed with saving people money.
Do the print OEMs have fixed costs to dealers? What happens when supplies or parts have price hikes? Do dealers just eat the cost increase?
I fear the disaster coming to print providers who sell IT services with that mentality. Because successful IT services providers constantly evaluate and adjust the end-users pricing because IT services are highly fluid.
Authentic Upstream, IT service providers focus on accurate technology alignments; they don't focus on saving people money; they focus on protecting people's information and deploying technology infrastructures proficiently.
I continuously preach that IT services is about delivering products and services based on discipline, standardization, and mutually agreed outcomes between the MSP and the customer without deviating acceptable profits based on price.
Successful IT service providers have zero-tolerance regarding sacrificing profits.
Successful It services providers are not in business to beat a competitor; they are in business to solve their clients' problems.
IT service providers don't run around looking for leases to upgrade; they don't become consumed in buying out competitor contracts just to get a customer regardless of its profitability; they focus on the right customer who understands the value of security and compliance and is highly dependent on the performance of their technology infrastructure.
In addition, IT services providers assess (FEE-BASED) the prospect's technology and recommend solutions based on outcomes, not price or the prospect's current cost.
IT providers will occasionally find through correct assessments which are absolute dysfunction in a prospects' overall technology.
They will discover telephony dysfunction, ISP dysfunction, unaligned software licensing, backup, and continuity issues; the list is enormous, and those IT services providers who understand print can also add print equipment dysfunctions and disasters to the list of things they can fix.
If the customer is in a terrible lease scenario regarding print services, they can explain it to the customer, and when appropriate, they can help replace the equipment. Remember, you can always vendor manage a bad copier/print engagement until the right time to replace it.
Print services companies who have transitioned to IT services companies are positioned perfectly to disrupt print services through vendor management arrangements. Provided they are not obsessed with buying out the prospects copier lease to get the deal by close-out - Friday!
This vendor management concept will eliminate premature buyouts. So, eventually, when the print is added to the overall IT contract, the profit will increase tremendously. I will discuss this concept more throughout the year.
In Closing:
Please don't attempt to deliver IT or any broader services based on saving people money from current technology agreements or leases. Instead, honestly evaluate the appropriate cost needed to ensure you and the customers achieve the correct outcomes.
Stay tuned to The End of The Day With Ray! for more on this subject.
Ray Stasieczko, Host of The End Of The Day With Ray!
Comments will be approved before showing up.
I wanted to share some thoughts to inspire our industry's actors especially the media to ask more questions. The absolute miscalculation (FAILURE) In MWA Intelligence FORZA ERP not succeeding in replacing eAutomate the industry’s leading ERP should give grounds to do more research. As we see new excited entrepreneurs who think they can do what MWA Intelligence failed at. I also believe that the industry’s analysts and media should be extremely inquisitive in understanding all the realities regarding any new attempts by these entrepreneurs. I see the industry’s media actors repeating the same approach as they had with MWA Intelligence and that approach did not prepare the dealers for the eventually out come.
It seems as the Lawsuits Involving Dex Imaging VS. Impact Networking and DME vs. Dex Imaging show hypocrisy! I also discuss the new allegations regarding the Ex CEO of Pacific Office Automation! I did find some pictures of the event where the alleged allegations took place!
In today's episode I share some thoughts and of course NUMBERS regarding Kyocera buying Xerox! If they did our #fujifilm friends would definitely have to buy #konicaminolta We need some action at the OEM level! #kyocera has the access to boat loads of cash I strongly suggest they get aggressive in the ACTION!
ray stasieczko
Author